CloudSite Compare
Open CloudSite

Build options · Marketing sites

Four ways to ship a site. One table, no theatre.

CloudSite, WordPress, Webflow and a traditional agency build solve overlapping problems. This page compares the parts that usually decide a marketing-site stack, and marks the places where the honest answer is “it depends”.

Generation1–3 min
Single-file cap2 MB
Languages per site4 max
MCP tools75
Preview link1–72 h

The comparison matrix

Scope: marketing sites with static delivery and up to four languages. Symbols describe native capability, not overall product quality.

CapabilityCloudSiteWordPressWebflowAgency build
AI full-site generationOne prompt, 1–3 minutesPlugin add-onsNot a native pathManual build
File-level editingAny file, 2 MB per fileTheme files plus databaseVisual canvasContract-dependent
Chat-based revisionschat_siteEditor onlyDesigner onlyVia account team
Static deploymentCloudflare Pages or FirebaseExport pluginsHosted static outputVaries by stack
MultilingualUp to 4 languages per sitePluginsLocalization featureScoped per project
Custom domain bindingAutomatic CNAME via CloudflareManual DNSDNS recordsHandover docs
Preview without loginLink valid 1–72 hoursSetup-dependentPlatform previewsStaging, often gated
Agent / MCP access75 MCP toolsREST APILimited APINot offered
Billing modelUsage-based walletHosting plus pluginsSubscription tiersFixed project fee
✓native, documented capability ◐possible with add-ons, configuration or custom work ✗not a supported path

How to read it

Three caveats before this table goes into a procurement document.

Scope

We compare delivery of a marketing site: static hosting, file access, multilingual output and domain setup. Catalogues, memberships and app backends are out of scope.

“Partial” is real

WordPress can produce a static export, Webflow can host a fast site, and an agency can hand over clean files. The symbol marks the default path, not the ceiling.

Not compared

Price, plugin depth, design ceiling and support SLAs. Each depends on plan, region and contract, so they are better checked directly than scored here.

Where each option fits

An honest shortlist usually keeps two candidates, not one.

CloudSite tends to fit when

  • You want a deployed marketing site in minutes, not a build queue.
  • You prefer editing files and chatting changes over a locked canvas.
  • Agents or internal tools should drive the site through MCP.
  • Four languages per site is enough for your markets.

Another option may fit better when

  • You need a deep plugin ecosystem and already run WordPress.
  • Your design team wants a visual canvas as the source of truth.
  • Procurement requires one vendor contract and a fixed scope.
  • You need capabilities beyond static marketing pages.

Check the table against your own brief.

Describe the site in one sentence, choose a style and language set, then review the result on a preview link that needs no login and expires in 1–72 hours.

Generate a site →